Outcomes in people with eating disorders: a transdiagnostic and disorder-specific systematic review, meta-analysis and multivariable meta-regression analysis.

Eating disorders (EDs) are known to be associated with high mortality and often chronic and severe course, but a recent comprehensive systematic review of their outcomes is currently missing. In the present systematic review and meta-analysis, we examined cohort studies and clinical trials published between 1980 and 2021 that reported, for DSM/ICD-defined EDs, overall ED outcomes (i.e., recovery, improvement and relapse, all-cause and ED-related hospitalization, and chronicity); the same outcomes related to purging, binge eating and body weight status; as well as mortality. We included 415 studies (N=88,372, mean age: 25.7±6.9 years, females: 72.4%, mean follow-up: 38.3±76.5 months), conducted in persons with anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), binge eating disorder (BED), other specified feeding and eating disorders (OSFED), and/or mixed EDs, from all continents except Africa. In all EDs pooled together, overall recovery occurred in 46% of patients (95% CI: 44-49, n=283, mean follow-up: 44.9±62.8 months, no significant ED-group difference). The recovery rate was 42% at <2 years, 43% at 2 to <4 years, 54% at 4 to <6 years, 59% at 6 to <8 years, 64% at 8 to <10 years, and 67% at ≥10 years. Overall chronicity occurred in 25% of patients (95% CI: 23-29, n=170, mean follow-up: 59.3±71.2 months, no significant ED-group difference). The chronicity rate was 33% at <2 years, 40% at 2 to <4 years, 23% at 4 to <6 years, 25% at 6 to <8 years, 12% at 8 to <10 years, and 18% at ≥10 years. Mortality occurred in 0.4% of patients (95% CI: 0.2-0.7, n=214, mean follow-up: 72.2±117.7 months, no significant ED-group difference). Considering observational studies, the mortality rate was 5.2 deaths/1,000 person-years (95% CI: 4.4-6.1, n=167, mean follow-up: 88.7±120.5 months; significant difference among EDs: p<0.01, range: from 8.2 for mixed ED to 3.4 for BN). Hospitalization occurred in 26% of patients (95% CI: 18-36, n=18, mean follow-up: 43.2±41.6 months; significant difference among EDs: p<0.001, range: from 32% for AN to 4% for BN). Regarding diagnostic migration, 8% of patients with AN migrated to BN and 16% to OSFED; 2% of patients with BN migrated to AN, 5% to BED, and 19% to OSFED; 9% of patients with BED migrated to BN and 19% to OSFED; 7% of patients with OSFED migrated to AN and 10% to BN. Children/adolescents had more favorable outcomes across and within EDs than adults. Self-injurious behaviors were associated with lower recovery rates in pooled EDs. A higher socio-demographic index moderated lower recovery and higher chronicity in AN across countries. Specific treatments associated with higher recovery rates were family-based therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), psychodynamic therapy, and nutritional interventions for AN; self-help, CBT, dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT), psychodynamic therapy, nutritional and pharmacological treatments for BN; CBT, nutritional and pharmacological interventions, and DBT for BED; and CBT and psychodynamic therapy for OSFED. In AN, pharmacological treatment was associated with lower recovery, and waiting list with higher mortality. These results should inform future research, clinical practice and health service organization for persons with EDs.

An umbrella review of candidate predictors of response, remission, recovery, and relapse across mental disorders.

We aimed to identify diagnosis-specific/transdiagnostic/transoutcome multivariable candidate predictors (MCPs) of key outcomes in mental disorders. We conducted an umbrella review (protocol  link ), searching MEDLINE/Embase (19/07/2022), including systematic reviews of studies reporting on MCPs of response, remission, recovery, or relapse, in DSM/ICD-defined mental disorders. From published predictors, we filtered MCPs, validating MCP criteria. AMSTAR2/PROBAST measured quality/risk of bias of systematic reviews/individual studies. We included 117 systematic reviews, 403 studies, 299,888 individuals with mental disorders, testing 796 prediction models. Only 4.3%/1.2% of the systematic reviews/individual studies were at low risk of bias. The most frequently targeted outcome was remission (36.9%), the least frequent was recovery (2.5%). Studies mainly focused on depressive (39.4%), substance-use (17.9%), and schizophrenia-spectrum (11.9%) disorders. We identified numerous MCPs within disorders for response, remission and relapse, but none for recovery. Transdiagnostic MCPs of remission included lower disease-specific symptoms (disorders = 5), female sex/higher education (disorders = 3), and quality of life/functioning (disorders = 2). Transdiagnostic MCPs of relapse included higher disease-specific symptoms (disorders = 5), higher depressive symptoms (disorders = 3), and younger age/higher anxiety symptoms/global illness severity/ number of previous episodes/negative life events (disorders = 2). Finally, positive trans-outcome MCPs for depression included less negative life events/depressive symptoms (response, remission, less relapse), female sex (response, remission) and better functioning (response, less relapse); for schizophrenia, less positive symptoms/higher depressive symptoms (remission, less relapse); for substance use disorder, marital status/higher education (remission, less relapse). Male sex, younger age, more clinical symptoms and comorbid mental/physical symptoms/disorders were poor prognostic factors, while positive factors included social contacts and employment, absent negative life events, higher education, early access/intervention, lower disease-specific and comorbid mental and physical symptoms/conditions, across mental disorders. Current data limitations include high risk of bias of studies and extraction of single predictors from multivariable models. Identified MCPs can inform future development, validation or refinement of prediction models of key outcomes in mental disorders.

Weight Gain and Metabolic Changes in Patients With First-Episode Psychosis or Early-Phase Schizophrenia Treated With Olanzapine: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with first-episode psychosis or early-phase schizophrenia are susceptible to olanzapine-associated weight gain and cardiometabolic dysregulation. This meta-analysis characterized weight and metabolic effects observed during olanzapine treatment in randomized clinical trials in this vulnerable patient population. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Dialog were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting weight or cardiometabolic outcomes associated with olanzapine treatment in first-episode psychosis or early-phase schizophrenia. Random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression were conducted using R v4.0.5. RESULTS: Of 1203 records identified, 26 RCTs informed the analyses. The meta-analytic mean (95% CI) weight gain was 7.53 (6.42-8.63) kg in studies (n = 19) that reported weight gain with olanzapine treatment. Stratified by duration, the mean (95% CI) weight gain was significantly higher in studies >13 weeks in duration than in those lasting ≤13 weeks: 11.35 (10.05-12.65) vs 5.51 (4.73-6.28) kg, respectively. Despite between-study variability, increases from baseline in most glycemic and lipid parameters were generally small in studies of both ≤13 and >13 weeks. There were no correlations, however, between weight gain and metabolic parameter changes when stratified by study duration. CONCLUSIONS: In RCTs enrolling patients with first-episode psychosis or early-phase schizophrenia, olanzapine was consistently associated with weight gain that was greater in studies lasting >13 weeks compared with those of ≤13 weeks. Metabolic changes observed across studies suggest that RCTs may underestimate metabolic sequelae vs real-world treatment observations. Patients with first-episode psychosis or early-phase schizophrenia are vulnerable to olanzapine-associated weight gain; strategies minimizing olanzapine-associated weight gain should be carefully considered.

Switching to long-acting injectable antipsychotics: pharmacological considerations and practical approaches.

INTRODUCTION: Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) are an effective, but potentially underutilized treatment option in schizophrenia and other severe mental illnesses. Prescribing information typically focuses on how to initiate treatment from the corresponding oral formulations. However, in clinical practice other scenarios, such as switching from other oral antipsychotics or other LAIs, occur frequently, requiring guidance. AREAS COVERED: Pharmacodynamic properties of antipsychotics and their relation to rebound symptoms. Pharmacokinetic properties of LAIs and their implications for switching approaches. Specific approaches to switching to LAIs. EXPERT OPINION: The LAI landscape has evolved significantly in the last decade with more formulations available, longer dosing intervals, and extended indications. However, currently available LAIs have various shortcomings, e.g. short dosing intervals, need for oral supplementation, loading regimens, deep intramuscular injection and/or restricted indications. Recent improvements include a one-day initiation option for aripiprazole lauroxil, aripiprazole monohydrate once-monthly, risperidone in situ microparticles and subcutaneous risperidone. Future LAI developments should focus on longer dosing intervals, subcutaneous administration, expansion of LAIs beyond currently available antipsychotic agents and indications beyond schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. In the future, LAIs might become a first-line treatment after initial oral stabilization for chronic mental disorders with need for maintenance treatment and presence of significant non-adherence.

Neonatal and maternal outcomes with elective cesarean section compared to induction of labor in twin pregnancies: A prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare neonatal and maternal outcomes in twin pregnancies with elective cesarean section (ECS) and induction of labor (IOL) to better inform women during the counselling process. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a cohort study including all twin pregnancies referred to the Department of Obstetrics at Kolding University Hospital, Denmark between January 2007 to April 2019 (n = 819). The primary analysis compared maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies planned for IOL with those planned for ECS after week 34. A secondary analysis compared maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies who underwent IOL followed by successful vaginal delivery with outcomes in those who underwent ECS. RESULTS: Among 587 eligible twin pregnancies, the rates of unplanned CS did not differ between those planned for ECS compared to those planned for IOL (38% vs. 33%; p = 0.27). IOL resulted in successful vaginal delivery in 67% (155/231) of those planned for IOL. Maternal outcomes did not differ between women who were planned for, or received, delivery with either IOL or ECS. Regarding neonatal outcomes, significantly more neonates required treatment with C-PAP in ECS group, than in the IOL group, and a higher median number of maturity days among mothers planned for ECS. However, no other significant difference in neonatal outcomes was observed when comparing successful IOL with successful ECS. CONCLUSION: Induction of labor was not associated with worse outcomes compared to elective caesarean section in this large cohort of routinely handled twin pregnancies. In women with twin pregnancies indicated for delivery, who does not go into spontaneous labor, induction of labor is a safe option for both the mothers and their neonates.

The future of child and adolescent clinical psychopharmacology: A systematic review of phase 2, 3, or 4 randomized controlled trials of pharmacologic agents without regulatory approval or for unapproved indications.

We aimed to identify promising novel medications for child and adolescent mental health problems. We systematically searched https://clinicaltrials.gov/ and https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ (from 01/01/2010-08/23/2022) for phase 2 or 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of medications without regulatory approval in the US, Europe or Asia, including also RCTs of dietary interventions/probiotics. Additionally, we searched phase 4 RCTs of agents targeting unlicensed indications for children/adolescents with mental health disorders. We retrieved 234 ongoing or completed RCTs, including 26 (11%) with positive findings on ≥ 1 primary outcome, 43 (18%) with negative/unavailable results on every primary outcome, and 165 (70%) without publicly available statistical results. The only two compounds with evidence of significant effects that were replicated in ≥ 1 additional RCT without any negative RCTs were dasotraline for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and carbetocin for hyperphagia in Prader-Willi syndrome. Among other strategies, targeting specific symptom dimensions in samples stratified based on clinical characteristics or established biomarkers may increase chances of success in future development programmes.

Candidate diagnostic biomarkers for neurodevelopmental disorders in children and adolescents: a systematic review.

Neurodevelopmental disorders - including attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder, communication disorders, intellectual disability, motor disorders, specific learning disorders, and tic disorders - manifest themselves early in development. Valid, reliable and broadly usable biomarkers supporting a timely diagnosis of these disorders would be highly relevant from a clinical and public health standpoint. We conducted the first systematic review of studies on candidate diagnostic biomarkers for these disorders in children and adolescents. We searched Medline and Embase + Embase Classic with terms relating to biomarkers until April 6, 2022, and conducted additional targeted searches for genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and neuroimaging or neurophysiological studies carried out by international consortia. We considered a candidate biomarker as promising if it was reported in at least two independent studies providing evidence of sensitivity and specificity of at least 80%. After screening 10,625 references, we retained 780 studies (374 biochemical, 203 neuroimaging, 133 neurophysiological and 65 neuropsychological studies, and five GWAS), including a total of approximately 120,000 cases and 176,000 controls. While the majority of the studies focused simply on associations, we could not find any biomarker for which there was evidence - from two or more studies from independent research groups, with results going into the same direction - of specificity and sensitivity of at least 80%. Other important metrics to assess the validity of a candidate biomarker, such as positive predictive value and negative predictive value, were infrequently reported. Limitations of the currently available studies include mostly small sample size, heterogeneous approaches and candidate biomarker targets, undue focus on single instead of joint biomarker signatures, and incomplete accounting for potential confounding factors. Future multivariable and multi-level approaches may be best suited to find valid candidate biomarkers, which will then need to be validated in external, independent samples and then, importantly, tested in terms of feasibility and cost-effectiveness, before they can be implemented in daily clinical practice.

The future of psychopharmacology: a critical appraisal of ongoing phase 2/3 trials, and of some current trends aiming to de-risk trial programmes of novel agents.

Despite considerable progress in pharmacotherapy over the past seven decades, many mental disorders remain insufficiently treated. This situation is in part due to the limited knowledge of the pathophysiology of these disorders and the lack of biological markers to stratify and individualize patient selection, but also to a still restricted number of mechanisms of action being targeted in monotherapy or combination/augmentation treatment, as well as to a variety of challenges threatening the successful development and testing of new drugs. In this paper, we first provide an overview of the most promising drugs with innovative mechanisms of action that are undergoing phase 2 or 3 testing for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety and trauma-related disorders, substance use disorders, and dementia. Promising repurposing of established medications for new psychiatric indications, as well as variations in the modulation of dopamine, noradrenaline and serotonin receptor functioning, are also considered. We then critically discuss the clinical trial parameters that need to be considered in depth when developing and testing new pharmacological agents for the treatment of mental disorders. Hurdles and perils threatening success of new drug development and testing include inadequacy and imprecision of inclusion/exclusion criteria and ratings, sub-optimally suited clinical trial participants, multiple factors contributing to a large/increasing placebo effect, and problems with statistical analyses. This information should be considered in order to de-risk trial programmes of novel agents or known agents for novel psychiatric indications, increasing their chances of success.

Impact of low-dose quetiapine-use on glycosylated hemoglobin, triglyceride and cholesterol levels.

OBJECTIVE: Quetiapine use at standard doses has been associated with hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia. However, whether even frequently prescribed low-dose quetiapine results in significant metabolic disturbances remains unclear. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the association between off-label, low-dose quetiapine and changes in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels/lipid parameters. METHODS: We identified new users of low-dose quetiapine (≤50 mg tablets) in Denmark 2008-2018 with measurements of HbA1c, total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), or fasting triglycerides (fTG) within 365 days before and after quetiapine initiation. Mixed-effects linear regression models were used to estimate coefficients (ß) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) for change in cardiometabolic parameters after quetiapine initiation. Inverse probability weighting was used to mitigate selection bias. Higher doses of quetiapine (>50 mg) were included in sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Among 106,711 eligible new low-dose quetiapine users (median age = 45 years, females = 55%), low-dose quetiapine initiation was associated with increased fTG (ß = 1.049[95%CI:1.027-1.072]) and decreased HDL-C (ß = 0.982[0.978-0.986]). Although HbA1c did not change significantly and TC and LDL-C even decreased considering all subjects, all three metabolic parameters increased significantly among individuals with normal pre-quetiapine initiation levels. The adverse metabolic effect of quetiapine on HbA1c, TC, LDL-C, and HDL-C was dose-dependent, which was not the case for fTG. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose quetiapine was associated with a significant increase in fTG and decreases in HDL-C in all subjects, as well as with significant increases in HbA1c, TC, and LDL-C among those with normal baseline values. The risk of metabolic worsening with quetiapine was dose-dependent, except for fTG.

Use of benzodiazepines and benzodiazepine-related drugs in the Nordic countries between 2000 and 2020.

Use of benzodiazepines (BZ) and related drugs is subject to considerable debate due to problems with dependency and adverse events. We aimed to describe and compare their use across the Nordic countries. Data on the use of clonazepam, BZ-sedatives, BZ-hypnotics, and benzodiazepine-related drugs (BZRD) in adults (≥20 years) were obtained from nationwide registers in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden, 2000-2020. Main measures were therapeutic intensity (TI:DDD/1000 inhabitants [inhab.]/day) and annual prevalence (users/1000 inhab./year). Overall, TI of BZ and related drugs decreased in all Nordic countries from 2004 to 2020. However, there were considerable differences between countries in TI. In 2020, the TI of BZ and related drugs ranged from 17 DDD/1000 inhab./day in Denmark to 93 DDD/1000 inhab./day in Iceland. BZRD accounted for 55-78% of BZ use in 2020, followed by BZ sedatives at 20-44%, BZ-hypnotics at <1-5%, and clonazepam at <1-2%. Annual prevalence of BZ use increased with age in all countries, and the highest annual prevalence was observed among people ≥80 years. Overall, the use of BZ and related drugs has decreased in all Nordic countries from 2004 to 2020, however, with considerable differences in their use between countries. The highest prevalence was observed among the oldest age groups-despite warnings against their use in this population.

Hospitalisation time is associated with weight gain in forensic mental health patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.

INTRODUCTION: People with mental disorders have higher mortality from lifestyle diseases than the general population. Forensic mental health patients (FMHPs) are often hospitalised for longer periods of time than non-FMHPs. Thus, hospitalisation may have a greater effect on the risk of lifestyle diseases in FMHPs. OBJECTIVE: Investigate associations between proportional hospitalisation time (PHT) and change in body weight or other cardiometabolic risk factors among FMHPs. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including all FMHPs with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, prescribed antipsychotics, and treated between 01 January 2016 and 06 April 2020 in the Region of Southern Denmark either in forensic units or as outpatients. Associations between PHT and, respectively, primary and secondary outcomes were analysed using linear regression. PHT was determined between each measurement of the outcomes as the number of days hospitalised divided by the total number of days within the time-period. The primary outcome was weight change and secondary outcomes were change in waist circumference (WC), blood pressure, estimated average glucose (eAG), HDL, LDL, total cholesterol, and triglycerides. Analyses were adjusted for gender, age, smoking, and antipsychotics. RESULTS: The cohort included 490 FMHPs, of which 440 were diagnosed with schizophrenia. PHT had a significant positive dose-response association with weight change, with an estimated difference of +4.0 kg/year for FMHPs who were hospitalised 100% of the time, compared to FMHPs who were exclusively treated as outpatients. The association interacted with baseline BMI. From the secondary outcomes, the association with PHT was only statistically significant for WC. CONCLUSIONS: PHT was positively associated with weight gain.

Pharmacological treatment of alcohol use disorder in patients with psychotic disorders: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Patients with psychotic disorders (PD) often have comorbid alcohol use dis- order (AUD), which is typically treated pharmacologically. Up till now, no systematic review has ex- amined the effectiveness and safety of AUD treatment in PD patients.

Objectives: This study aimed to systematically review the literature on (1) the effects of pharmacolog- ical treatments for AUD on drinking outcomes, (2) the side effects of the drugs, and (3) the effects of polypharmacy in patients with comorbid AUD and PD.

Methods: Bibliographic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and PsycINFO. At least two reviewers extracted the data, assessed the risk of bi- as, and performed the qualitative synthesis of the collected evidence.

Results: Twelve eligible studies were identified, half being randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Three studies examined disulfiram, nine naltrexone, two acamprosate, and one nalmefene by comparing the effects of treatment to placebo, baseline, or other pharmacological agents. Disulfiram and naltrexone were shown to reduce alcohol intake. Regarding acamprosate, the findings were mixed. Nalmefene decreased alcohol intake. All pharmacological agents appeared safe to use as AUD mono- therapy, but cardiac events were reported when combining naltrexone and disulfiram. Nine studies had a high risk of bias, and three had some other concerns.

Conclusion: The studies provide tentative support for the use of naltrexone and disulfiram in this population, although combinations of pharmacological AUD treatments and other polypharmacy remain unexplored. The studies had high adherence rates that are hardly replicable in real-world settings.

Ulotaront: a TAAR1/5-HT1A agonist in clinical development for the treatment of schizophrenia.

INTRODUCTION: Current antipsychotics are postsynaptic dopamine-2(D2) receptor blockers, which often, but not always, effectively improve acute psychotic symptoms and prevent relapse in schizophrenia and other severe mental disorders, but are associated with various side effects, including parkinsonism, akathisia, sedation/somnolence, and cardiometabolic alterations. Furthermore, the efficacy of current antipsychotics for negative and cognitive symptoms in schizophrenia is limited. Ulotaront is a novel trace-amine-associated receptor-1(TAAR1) agonist with serotonin-1A receptor agonist activity, and without postsynaptic D2-receptor antagonism. Phase 2 clinical data for ulotaront in patients with acutely exacerbated schizophrenia are promising regarding the potential improvement in positive, negative, and depressive symptoms. AREAS COVERED: An overview of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of ulotaront is given. Summary of clinical efficacy and safety/tolerability from Phase 1/2-trials, and of ongoing Phase 3-trials, is also given. EXPERT OPINION: Ulotaront is a promising agent for the treatment of schizophrenia with an apparent benign safety profile, which might provide a much-needed new and different treatment option for various domains of schizophrenia. Data from larger Phase 3-trials, including for relapse prevention, schizophrenia subdomains, and in adolescents, are awaited. If ongoing Phase 3-trials in adults are successful, further research on combination regimens with existing antipsychotics, and in treatment-resistant schizophrenia as well as in mood disorders would be desirable.

Use of low-dose quetiapine increases the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events: results from a nationwide active comparator-controlled cohort study.

At standard doses used for schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, quetiapine has been associated with weight gain and increased levels of triglycerides, to-tal cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, which are risk factors for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. However, this drug is also commonly used off-label at low doses for anxiolytic or hypnotic purposes, and its cardiovascular safety at these doses is unknown. We aimed to assess the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events with use of low-dose quetiapine compared to use of Z-drug hypnotics in a nationwide, active comparator-controlled cohort study. The cohort included new users of either drugs in Denmark from 2003 to 2017, aged 18-85 years, without history of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, cancer, and severe mental illness. The main outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as non-fatal myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) were used as an alternative comparator in sensitivity analyses. Altogether, we compared 60,566 low-dose quetiapine users with 454,567 Z-drug users, followed for 890,198 person-years in intent-to-treat analysis, and 330,334 person-years in as-treated analysis. In intention-to-treat analysis, low-dose quetiapine was associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (adjusted hazard ratio, aHR=1.13, 95% CI: 1.02-1.24, p=0.014) and cardiovascular death (aHR=1.26, 95% CI: 1.11-1.43, p<0.001). In as-treated analysis, continuous low-dose quetiapine use was associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (aHR=1.52, 95% CI: 1.35-1.70, p<0.001), non-fatal ischemic stroke (aHR=1.37, 95% CI: 1.13-1.68, p=0.002) and cardiovascular death (aHR=1.90, 95% CI: 1.64-2.19, p<0.001). The risk of major adverse cardiovascular events was greater in women (aHR=1.28, p=0.02) and those aged ≥65 years at initiation (aHR=1.24, p<0.001). Compared to SSRIs, low-dose quetiapine use was associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (aHR=1.42, p<0.001), non-fatal ischemic stroke (aHR=1.27, p=0.0028) and cardiovascular death (aHR=1.72, p<0.001). So, we conclude that the use of low-dose quetiapine is associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, especially in women and the elderly. On the basis of these findings, we suggest that use of off-label low-dose quetiapine for sedative or hypnotic purposes should be discouraged.

Psychopharmacological treatment patterns prior to a schizophrenia diagnosis: A Danish nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with schizophrenia experience psychiatric symptoms long before being diagnosed. We investigated patterns of pre-diagnostic psychopharmacological treatment in individuals diagnosed with first-episode schizophrenia during the last two decades. DESIGN: Using Danish nationwide healthcare registers, we identified all individuals aged ≥10 years registered with their first ICD-10 schizophrenia diagnosis between January 1999 and March 2019. For each calendar year from 1999 to 2019, we calculated the proportion of patients - among those having received their first schizophrenia diagnosis in the respective calendar year - who redeemed prescriptions for various psychotropics in the two years preceding the schizophrenia diagnosis. We calculated proportions of all pre-diagnostic prescriptions since 1995 for a sub-population diagnosed 2011-2019 and for an age- and sex-matched reference group without schizophrenia. RESULTS: Among 33,361 individuals with schizophrenia (58 % males), the schizophrenia incidence rate was stable during the study period but the mean age at diagnosis decreased by >10 years. In the two pre-diagnostic years, 69 % received psychopharmacological treatment (52 % antipsychotics, 40 % antidepressants). This was stable between 1999 and 2019. Among 14,425 individuals diagnosed 2011-2019, psychotropic drug use was observed among 14-20 % between 24 and 10 years before the diagnosis, being four times higher than the reference group. Particularly antipsychotic and antidepressant drug use increased steadily during the ten pre-diagnostic years. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-diagnostic psychotropic drug use in schizophrenia was frequent but stable between 1999 and 2019 despite an earlier identification of schizophrenia patients. Our findings emphasize the continued importance of thorough diagnostic interviews, particularly among patients in need of antipsychotic treatment.

Free-of-charge dispensing of antipsychotics for schizophrenia in Denmark: Impact on the nationwide prescription registry and redemption of somatic medications.

OBJECTIVE: Free-of-charge dispensing of antipsychotics for schizophrenia was introduced in Denmark around 2008. However, free-of-charge dispensing is not recorded in the Danish National Prescription Register (DNPR), potentially introducing bias and misclassification. METHODS: We identified all 30 275 individuals with a first-episode schizophrenia diagnosis in Denmark between 1 January 1999 and 1 March 2017 including all redeemed prescriptions registered in the DNPR during the 2 years after the schizophrenia diagnosis. For each calendar year, we calculated the proportion of individuals who had filled ≥1 prescription for psychotropic and/or somatic medications within the first 2 years after the schizophrenia diagnosis. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2017, the proportion of individuals with prescription-records for any psychotropic medication during the 2 years after the schizophrenia diagnosis decreased from 88% to 74%, particularly antipsychotics (from 83% to 61%) and antidepressants (from 49% to 35%). This was particularly observed among those aged 18-30 years at the schizophrenia diagnosis. A similar decrease was not observed for prescription-records of somatic medications. CONCLUSION: The introduction of free-of-charge antipsychotics has affected the redemption of specific psychotropic drugs in the DNPR in first-episode schizophrenia. This limitation needs to be considered in register-based studies and emphasizes the need to identify solutions.

Lithium and the risk of chronic kidney disease: A population-based case-control study.

The association between lithium use and chronic kidney disease (CKD) needs further evaluation. We aimed to investigate this association using Danish nationwide healthcare registers and routinely collected plasma creatinine measurements from the Funen Laboratory Cohort. We conducted a case-control study nested within the population of Funen, 2001-2015. Incident cases of CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73m2 ; n = 21 432) were matched with four CKD-free controls on age, sex and calendar time (n = 85 532). We estimated odds ratios (OR) for the association between lithium exposure and CKD using conditional logistic regression models, adjusted for known risk factors for CKD. Ever-use of lithium was associated with an increased risk of CKD (adjusted OR [aOR]: 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.33-1.85). A stronger association was seen with current use of lithium (aOR: 1.92; 95%CI: 1.58-2.33) and long-term use of lithium (>10 years: aOR: 3.02; 95%CI: 2.00-4.56). Furthermore, we found evidence of a dose-response relationship between cumulative dose of lithium and the risk of CKD. In conclusion, the use of lithium, especially long-term, is associated with an increased risk of CKD, although the extent to which detection bias and confounding by indication contribute to the association is unclear. Monitoring of kidney function in lithium users remains mandatory to identify individuals in which switching to alternative medications should be considered.

Who prescribes quetiapine in Denmark?

The second-generation antipsychotic quetiapine is commonly used off-label for its anxiolytic and hypnotic properties. However, quetiapine is associated with problematic side-effects. We used Danish Medicinal Product Statistics and a 20% random sample of the Danish population's prescription fills (2001-2020) to describe the utilization of quetiapine and proportion of various prescriber types (general practitioner [GP], specialist in private practice, hospital physician and other prescribers) both in connection to first-time and subsequent prescriptions. In 2020, 92% of all quetiapine was dispensed outside hospitals and the average daily dispensed quantity of quetiapine per user corresponded to 100 mg/user/d. A GP issued 53% of first-time prescriptions and 75% of subsequent prescriptions for quetiapine in 2020. The proportion of quetiapine prescriptions issued by GPs varied by age group-from 14% among 0-17-year-olds to 93% among the ≥80-year-olds. Future initiatives on the rational use of quetiapine and related drugs, especially among adults, should target GPs.